Ego may sometimes be the issue. My observation is that it is more often fear that keeps people away. The fear of losing control. The fear of the unknown. I was talking with a new colleague recently who is a successful coach. I did not experience her as someone with ego or domination issues. When I described Open Space, her comment was similar to what I often hear from organizational leaders. Fear of losing control, of not knowing what the people in the organization would do if invited to an open meeting. I think the reluctance has far more to do with the high value Western culture tends to put on certainty. We’ve been trained away from trusting the opportunities inherent in exploring the unknown. In these situations I see my work as opening their eyes to the potential for breakthrough and innovation that increases by bringing the diversity of the system together in welcoming conditions around a question that matters. Looking forward to continuing the conversation tomorrow. Thanks, again, Thomas for organizing the call. Peggy _________________________________ Peggy Holman peggy@peggyholman.com Bellevue, WA 98006 206-948-0432 www.peggyholman.com Enjoy the award winning Engaging Emergence: Turning Upheaval into Opportunity <https://peggyholman.com/papers/engaging-emergence/> "An angel told me that the only way to step into the fire and not get burnt, is to become the fire". -- Drew Dellinger Join the Open Space practitioner’s conference - the World Open Space on Open Space (WOSonOS <https://www.wosonos2025.org/>) - in Kenya, November 6-8. > On Sep 5, 2025, at 10:03 AM, Rolf Schneidereit via OSList <everyone@oslist.org> wrote: > > @ Thomas, thank you for your question! For me, it also touches on the topic of participation in society and politics. > > @ Thank you, Michael, for your proposed explanation: “Capitalism is not interested in participation.” > > > > This got me thinking: Is it really that simple? If so, we would “only” have to change the system and everything would be fine. > > I don't think it's that simple. It's not the system, but “we” ourselves. Two short stories on this: > > Years ago, I was able to accompany the federal association of a German welfare organization through a participatory process. The process was successful and the seeds of participation began to take effect in other areas. Until a new managing director arrived. He summarily dismissed all participatory approaches. Anything that was not under his control no longer had a place. > > A second example: At a one-day conference of full-time employees of a German party that considers itself progressive, new participatory formats were experimented with. At the end, an employee came up to me and said that if we worked like this in the party, it would be truly revolutionary. The revolution did not happen: subsequent conferences were held in the traditional mode again. > > > > What I mean by this is that I believe that resistance to participation does not come from the system, but from within ourselves, from the desire to control, to dominate, from the desire to be right. > > These desires are familiar to me. My many years of work as a facilitator have smoothed them out somewhat, as have my conflicts with others. As a facilitator, I have repeatedly observed that different perspectives create a more comprehensive picture. > > > > Participation aims at collective intelligence. This contrasts with ego intelligence. Ego intelligence sees itself as superior to others. Ego intelligence does not need collective intelligence. > > By a majority, Americans have elected a particularly intelligent president. He is convinced that he is one of the most intelligent people alive. Everyone else must be fought. > > Ego intelligence does not want others to be intelligent too. It wants to shine alone in the spotlight. > > > > If it were a problem of capitalism, socialist experiments would have achieved something different. > > So, I believe, we are thrown back on ourselves. > > > Rolf > > > Am 03.09.2025 um 19:06 schrieb Michael M Pannwitz via OSList <everyone@oslist.org>: > > Dear Thomas Herrmann, > > for me its simple: > > Capitalism ist not interested in participation (the real stuff). > Profit is their goal. > > And, as Harrison experienced at the end of an ost event a professional consultant said: > "If stuff like open space spreads all of the large consulting firms can close down." > (It would save trillions worldwide if that were the case). > > Approaches that widen space and time for selforganisation is a red rag. > > I am interested in spreading open space work. > What I re-discovered is that its simple but not easy. > > I see colleagues not only polishing our art but also passing it on in > cooperative participative practice. > > Greetings from Berlin > mmp > > > Am 03.09.2025 um 16:27 schrieb Thomas Herrmann via OSList: >> I have posted a topic in the Open Space Garden on QiqoChat, and I welcome you to join if you are interested. >> Monday Sept 8th at 4 pm CEST. You can find your local time on QiqoChat where this description is again: https://openspace.qiqochat.com/gardens >> >> TOPIC TITLE: How come, that still in 2025, the vast majority of all gatherings in organizations are not highly participative co-creative meetings? >> >> Description: >> I have worked with Open Space Technology and other co-creative meetings since almost 30 years. I have trained many facilitators. >> The praise for participation is, as it was 1990, high throughout Sweden. Still the gatherings in most organizations look the same... Big table, boss at the end showing slides. Ending with asking “any questions?” Or workshops with lecturer after lecturer... Participation is an exception when it should be the norm. How come? Come share your thoughts on this in a listening circle. This meeting will start with a transfer in to land and focus in our circle, then a listening circle (passing an object around the circle 3 times with an invitation to share). Then a closingcircle. I plan to make an experiment, trying Zoom Assistant for capturing what is said and then I will make a summary to post on OSlist and QiqoChat. >> I am using my own link for this meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81190846862?pwd=YCkLSkhAH4XGRdnuIJwIdabDco0e5U.1&from=addon >> >> Please let me know if you plan to join! Email: thomas@openspaceconsulting.com <mailto:thomas@openspaceconsulting.com> >> Welcome >> >> Thomas Herrmann >> Open Space Consulting AB >> >> Pensévägen 4, 434 46 Kungsbacka, Sweden >> Telefon: +46 (0)709 98 97 81 >> Email: thomas@openspaceconsulting.com <mailto:thomas@openspaceconsulting.com> >> Homepage: www.openspaceconsulting.com <http://www.openspaceconsulting.com/> / www.5toFold.com <http://www.5tofold.com/> >> Profile on LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/thomasherrmannopenspaceconsult <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thomasherrmannopenspaceconsult> >> >> Open Space Consulting frigör livskraft i människor, organisationer och samhälle. >> We release lifepower in people, organizations and society. >> >> Trainings/workshops (Info & registration <https://openspaceconsulting.com/kategori/aktiviteter/kommande-aktiviteter/>) >> >> 9-11 Sept: Working with Open Space Technology, Lunteren, the Netherlands >> 23-25 Sept: Att arbeta hållbart med Open Space-metoden, Örby, Sverige >> 8 Okt: Erfa-utbyte om Open Space (gratis, online) >> 17-19 Okt: Open Space för Demokrati, Gullbrannagården. >> 6-8 Nov: WorldOpenSpaceOnOpenSpace, Nairobi, Kenya >> >> 2026 >> 20-22 Jan: Whole Person Process Facilitation, Örby Sverige >> 27-29 Jan: Att arbeta hållbart med Open Space-metoden, Örby, Sverige >> 11-13 March: Whole Person Process Facilitation, Lunteren, the Netherlands >> >> Continous opportunities for online learning - selfstudy + mentoring – leadership and facilitation incl Open Space >> <image001.png> >> >> >> >> >> OSList mailing list -- everyone@oslist.org <mailto:everyone@oslist.org> >> To unsubscribe send an email to everyone-leave@oslist.org <mailto:everyone-leave@oslist.org> >> See the archives here: https://oslist.org/empathy/list/everyone.oslist.org > > Michael M Pannwitz > Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany > +49 30 7728000 mmpannwitz@posteo.de <mailto:mmpannwitz@posteo.de> > > WOSonOS will be in Kenya in November 6th-8th, 2025, have a look > https://www.wosonos2025.org/ > OSList mailing list -- everyone@oslist.org <mailto:everyone@oslist.org> > To unsubscribe send an email to everyone-leave@oslist.org <mailto:everyone-leave@oslist.org> > See the archives here: https://oslist.org/empathy/list/everyone.oslist.org > > OSList mailing list -- everyone@oslist.org > To unsubscribe send an email to everyone-leave@oslist.org > See the archives here: https://oslist.org/empathy/list/everyone.oslist.org

Thank you, Peggy and John, for your perspectives. Perhaps it makes sense to look at the understanding of the term “ego.” In my understanding, “disconnection, isolation, otherness” are just as much aspects of the ego as “the fear of losing control” and “the fear of the unknown.” The ego is not only proactively seeking dominance, but can also express itself passively in fear. Perhaps even to this extent: behind the aggressive dominance of a Donald T. lies a huge fear of losing control. In this sense, I believe that ego is not something to be condemned, but something we should consciously accept as part of our human nature. Only then can it be named and addressed. True participation means giving up control, trusting the process, and enduring the initial openness to results. For the client, for the participants, for me as a facilitator—we all have to put aside a piece of our ego (our own intentions and ideas and goals and fears) in order to make something bigger possible together. Rolf Am 07.09.2025 um 17:53 schrieb Peggy Holman via OSList <everyone@oslist.org>: Ego may sometimes be the issue. My observation is that it is more often fear that keeps people away. The fear of losing control. The fear of the unknown. I was talking with a new colleague recently who is a successful coach. I did not experience her as someone with ego or domination issues. When I described Open Space, her comment was similar to what I often hear from organizational leaders. Fear of losing control, of not knowing what the people in the organization would do if invited to an open meeting. I think the reluctance has far more to do with the high value Western culture tends to put on certainty. We’ve been trained away from trusting the opportunities inherent in exploring the unknown. In these situations I see my work as opening their eyes to the potential for breakthrough and innovation that increases by bringing the diversity of the system together in welcoming conditions around a question that matters. Looking forward to continuing the conversation tomorrow. Thanks, again, Thomas for organizing the call. Peggy _________________________________ Peggy Holman peggy@peggyholman.com Bellevue, WA 98006 206-948-0432 www.peggyholman.com Enjoy the award winning Engaging Emergence: Turning Upheaval into Opportunity <https://peggyholman.com/papers/engaging-emergence/> "An angel told me that the only way to step into the fire and not get burnt, is to become the fire". -- Drew Dellinger Join the Open Space practitioner’s conference - the World Open Space on Open Space (WOSonOS <https://www.wosonos2025.org/>) - in Kenya, November 6-8. > On Sep 5, 2025, at 10:03 AM, Rolf Schneidereit via OSList <everyone@oslist.org> wrote: > > @ Thomas, thank you for your question! For me, it also touches on the topic of participation in society and politics. > > @ Thank you, Michael, for your proposed explanation: “Capitalism is not interested in participation.” > > > > This got me thinking: Is it really that simple? If so, we would “only” have to change the system and everything would be fine. > > I don't think it's that simple. It's not the system, but “we” ourselves. Two short stories on this: > > Years ago, I was able to accompany the federal association of a German welfare organization through a participatory process. The process was successful and the seeds of participation began to take effect in other areas. Until a new managing director arrived. He summarily dismissed all participatory approaches. Anything that was not under his control no longer had a place. > > A second example: At a one-day conference of full-time employees of a German party that considers itself progressive, new participatory formats were experimented with. At the end, an employee came up to me and said that if we worked like this in the party, it would be truly revolutionary. The revolution did not happen: subsequent conferences were held in the traditional mode again. > > > > What I mean by this is that I believe that resistance to participation does not come from the system, but from within ourselves, from the desire to control, to dominate, from the desire to be right. > > These desires are familiar to me. My many years of work as a facilitator have smoothed them out somewhat, as have my conflicts with others. As a facilitator, I have repeatedly observed that different perspectives create a more comprehensive picture. > > > > Participation aims at collective intelligence. This contrasts with ego intelligence. Ego intelligence sees itself as superior to others. Ego intelligence does not need collective intelligence. > > By a majority, Americans have elected a particularly intelligent president. He is convinced that he is one of the most intelligent people alive. Everyone else must be fought. > > Ego intelligence does not want others to be intelligent too. It wants to shine alone in the spotlight. > > > > If it were a problem of capitalism, socialist experiments would have achieved something different. > > So, I believe, we are thrown back on ourselves. > > > Rolf > > > Am 03.09.2025 um 19:06 schrieb Michael M Pannwitz via OSList <everyone@oslist.org>: > > Dear Thomas Herrmann, > > for me its simple: > > Capitalism ist not interested in participation (the real stuff). > Profit is their goal. > > And, as Harrison experienced at the end of an ost event a professional consultant said: > "If stuff like open space spreads all of the large consulting firms can close down." > (It would save trillions worldwide if that were the case). > > Approaches that widen space and time for selforganisation is a red rag. > > I am interested in spreading open space work. > What I re-discovered is that its simple but not easy. > > I see colleagues not only polishing our art but also passing it on in > cooperative participative practice. > > Greetings from Berlin > mmp > > > Am 03.09.2025 um 16:27 schrieb Thomas Herrmann via OSList: >> I have posted a topic in the Open Space Garden on QiqoChat, and I welcome you to join if you are interested. >> Monday Sept 8th at 4 pm CEST. You can find your local time on QiqoChat where this description is again: https://openspace.qiqochat.com/gardens >> >> TOPIC TITLE: How come, that still in 2025, the vast majority of all gatherings in organizations are not highly participative co-creative meetings? >> >> Description: >> I have worked with Open Space Technology and other co-creative meetings since almost 30 years. I have trained many facilitators. >> The praise for participation is, as it was 1990, high throughout Sweden. Still the gatherings in most organizations look the same... Big table, boss at the end showing slides. Ending with asking “any questions?” Or workshops with lecturer after lecturer... Participation is an exception when it should be the norm. How come? Come share your thoughts on this in a listening circle. This meeting will start with a transfer in to land and focus in our circle, then a listening circle (passing an object around the circle 3 times with an invitation to share). Then a closingcircle. I plan to make an experiment, trying Zoom Assistant for capturing what is said and then I will make a summary to post on OSlist and QiqoChat. >> I am using my own link for this meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81190846862?pwd=YCkLSkhAH4XGRdnuIJwIdabDco0e5U.1&from=addon >> >> Please let me know if you plan to join! Email: thomas@openspaceconsulting.com <mailto:thomas@openspaceconsulting.com> >> Welcome >> >> Thomas Herrmann >> Open Space Consulting AB >> >> Pensévägen 4, 434 46 Kungsbacka, Sweden >> Telefon: +46 (0)709 98 97 81 >> Email: thomas@openspaceconsulting.com <mailto:thomas@openspaceconsulting.com> >> Homepage: www.openspaceconsulting.com <http://www.openspaceconsulting.com/> / www.5toFold.com <http://www.5tofold.com/> >> Profile on LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/thomasherrmannopenspaceconsult <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thomasherrmannopenspaceconsult> >> >> Open Space Consulting frigör livskraft i människor, organisationer och samhälle. >> We release lifepower in people, organizations and society. >> >> Trainings/workshops (Info & registration <https://openspaceconsulting.com/kategori/aktiviteter/kommande-aktiviteter/>) >> >> 9-11 Sept: Working with Open Space Technology, Lunteren, the Netherlands >> 23-25 Sept: Att arbeta hållbart med Open Space-metoden, Örby, Sverige >> 8 Okt: Erfa-utbyte om Open Space (gratis, online) >> 17-19 Okt: Open Space för Demokrati, Gullbrannagården. >> 6-8 Nov: WorldOpenSpaceOnOpenSpace, Nairobi, Kenya >> >> 2026 >> 20-22 Jan: Whole Person Process Facilitation, Örby Sverige >> 27-29 Jan: Att arbeta hållbart med Open Space-metoden, Örby, Sverige >> 11-13 March: Whole Person Process Facilitation, Lunteren, the Netherlands >> >> Continous opportunities for online learning - selfstudy + mentoring – leadership and facilitation incl Open Space >> <image001.png> >> >> >> >> >> OSList mailing list -- everyone@oslist.org <mailto:everyone@oslist.org> >> To unsubscribe send an email to everyone-leave@oslist.org <mailto:everyone-leave@oslist.org> >> See the archives here: https://oslist.org/empathy/list/everyone.oslist.org > > Michael M Pannwitz > Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany > +49 30 7728000 mmpannwitz@posteo.de <mailto:mmpannwitz@posteo.de> > > WOSonOS will be in Kenya in November 6th-8th, 2025, have a look > https://www.wosonos2025.org/ > OSList mailing list -- everyone@oslist.org <mailto:everyone@oslist.org> > To unsubscribe send an email to everyone-leave@oslist.org <mailto:everyone-leave@oslist.org> > See the archives here: https://oslist.org/empathy/list/everyone.oslist.org > > OSList mailing list -- everyone@oslist.org > To unsubscribe send an email to everyone-leave@oslist.org > See the archives here: https://oslist.org/empathy/list/everyone.oslist.org OSList mailing list -- everyone@oslist.org To unsubscribe send an email to everyone-leave@oslist.org See the archives here: https://oslist.org/empathy/list/everyone.oslist.org

Dear Rolf, can you read German? I dug up an article in a government Information publication back in 1973 (I was 33 years old). My colleague Jochen Lude and I wrote a piece as Gemeinwesenarbeiter (community organization) which reading it let me think "could have been written today" (now I am 85). If you can read German, I will send it to you and to anyone else who wants it. It focuses on "Citizens' initiatives - participation of those affected" Greetings from a sunny day in Berlin mmp Am 08.09.2025 um 08:13 schrieb Rolf Schneidereit via OSList: > > Thank you, Peggy and John, for your perspectives. > > Perhaps it makes sense to look at the understanding of the term “ego.” > > In my understanding, “disconnection, isolation, otherness” are just as > much aspects of the ego as “the fear of losing control” and “the fear > of the unknown.” The ego is not only proactively seeking dominance, > but can also express itself passively in fear. Perhaps even to this > extent: behind the aggressive dominance of a Donald T. lies a huge > fear of losing control. > > In this sense, I believe that ego is not something to be condemned, > but something we should consciously accept as part of our human > nature. Only then can it be named and addressed. > > True participation means giving up control, trusting the process, and > enduring the initial openness to results. > > For the client, for the participants, for me as a facilitator—we all > have to put aside a piece of our ego (our own intentions and ideas and > goals and fears) in order to make something bigger possible together. > > Rolf > > > > > Am 07.09.2025 um 17:53 schrieb Peggy Holman via OSList > <everyone@oslist.org>: > > Ego may sometimes be the issue. My observation is that it is more > often fear that keeps people away. The fear of losing control. The > fear of the unknown.  I was talking with a new colleague recently who > is a successful coach. I did not experience her as someone with ego or > domination issues. When I described Open Space, her comment was > similar to what I often hear from organizational leaders. Fear of > losing control, of not knowing what the people in the organization > would do if invited to an open meeting. > > I think the reluctance has far more to do with the high value Western > culture tends to put on certainty. We’ve been trained away from > trusting the opportunities inherent in exploring the unknown. > > In these situations I see my work as opening their eyes to the > potential for breakthrough and innovation that increases by bringing > the diversity of the system together in welcoming conditions around a > question that matters. > > Looking forward to continuing the conversation tomorrow. > > Thanks, again, Thomas for organizing the call. > > Peggy > > > > _________________________________ > Peggy Holman > peggy@peggyholman.com > > Bellevue, WA  98006 > 206-948-0432 > www.peggyholman.com > > Enjoy the award winning Engaging Emergence: Turning Upheaval > into Opportunity <https://peggyholman.com/papers/engaging-emergence/> > > "An angel told me that the only way to step into the fire and not get > burnt, is to become > the fire". >   -- Drew Dellinger > > Join the Open Space practitioner’s conference - the World Open Space > on Open Space (WOSonOS <https://www.wosonos2025.org/>) - in > Kenya, November 6-8. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Sep 5, 2025, at 10:03 AM, Rolf Schneidereit via OSList >> <everyone@oslist.org> wrote: >> >> @ Thomas, thank you for your question! For me, it also touches on the >> topic of participation in society and politics. >> >> @ Thank you, Michael, for your proposed explanation: “Capitalism is >> not interested in participation.” >> >> >> This got me thinking: Is it really that simple? If so, we would >> “only” have to change the system and everything would be fine. >> >> I don't think it's that simple. It's not the system, but “we” >> ourselves. Two short stories on this: >> >> Years ago, I was able to accompany the federal association of a >> German welfare organization through a participatory process. The >> process was successful and the seeds of participation began to take >> effect in other areas. Until a new managing director arrived. He >> summarily dismissed all participatory approaches. Anything that was >> not under his control no longer had a place. >> >> A second example: At a one-day conference of full-time employees of a >> German party that considers itself progressive, new participatory >> formats were experimented with. At the end, an employee came up to me >> and said that if we worked like this in the party, it would be truly >> revolutionary. The revolution did not happen: subsequent conferences >> were held in the traditional mode again. >> >> >> What I mean by this is that I believe that resistance to >> participation does not come from the system, but from within >> ourselves, from the desire to control, to dominate, from the desire >> to be right. >> >> These desires are familiar to me. My many years of work as a >> facilitator have smoothed them out somewhat, as have my conflicts >> with others. As a facilitator, I have repeatedly observed that >> different perspectives create a more comprehensive picture. >> >> >> Participation aims at collective intelligence. This contrasts with >> ego intelligence. Ego intelligence sees itself as superior to others. >> Ego intelligence does not need collective intelligence. >> >> By a majority, Americans have elected a particularly intelligent >> president. He is convinced that he is one of the most intelligent >> people alive. Everyone else must be fought. >> >> Ego intelligence does not want others to be intelligent too. It wants >> to shine alone in the spotlight. >> >> >> If it were a problem of capitalism, socialist experiments would have >> achieved something different. >> >> So, I believe, we are thrown back on ourselves. >> >> >> Rolf >> >> >> Am 03.09.2025 um 19:06 schrieb Michael M Pannwitz via OSList >> <everyone@oslist.org>: >> >> Dear Thomas Herrmann, >> >> for me its simple: >> >> Capitalism ist not interested in participation (the real stuff). >> Profit is their goal. >> >> And, as Harrison experienced at the end of an ost event a >> professional consultant said: >> "If stuff like open space spreads all of the large consulting firms >> can close down." >> (It would save trillions worldwide if that were the case). >> >> Approaches that widen space and time for selforganisation is a red rag. >> >> I am interested in spreading open space work. >> What I re-discovered is that its simple but not easy. >> >> I see colleagues not only polishing our art but also passing it on in >> cooperative participative practice. >> >> Greetings from Berlin >> mmp >> >> Am 03.09.2025 um 16:27 schrieb Thomas Herrmann via OSList: >>> I have posted a topic in the Open Space Garden on QiqoChat, and I >>> welcome you to join if you are interested. >>> Monday Sept 8th at 4 pm CEST. You can find your local time on >>> QiqoChat where this description is >>> again:https://openspace.qiqochat.com/gardens >>> TOPIC TITLE: How come, that still in 2025, the vast majority of all >>> gatherings in organizations are not highly participative co-creative >>> meetings? >>> Description: >>> I have worked with Open Space Technology and other co-creative >>> meetings since almost 30 years. I have trained many facilitators. >>> The praise for participation is, as it was 1990, high throughout >>> Sweden. Still the gatherings in most organizations look the same... >>> Big table, boss at the end showing slides. Ending with asking “any >>> questions?” Or workshops with lecturer after lecturer... >>> Participation is an exception when it should be the norm. How come? >>> Come share your thoughts on this in a listening circle. This meeting >>> will start with a transfer in to land and focus in our circle, then >>> a listening circle (passing an object around the circle 3 times with >>> an invitation to share). Then a closingcircle. I plan to make an >>> experiment, trying Zoom Assistant for capturing what is said and >>> then I will make a summary to post on OSlist and QiqoChat. >>> I am using my own link for this >>> meeting:https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81190846862?pwd=YCkLSkhAH4XGRdnuIJwIdabDco0e5U.1&from=addon >>> <https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81190846862?pwd=YCkLSkhAH4XGRdnuIJwIdabDco0e5U.1&from=addon> >>> Please let me know if you plan to join! >>> Email:thomas@openspaceconsulting.com >>> Welcome >>> Thomas Herrmann >>> Open Space Consulting AB >>> Pensévägen 4, 434 46 Kungsbacka, Sweden >>> Telefon: +46 (0)709 98 97 81 >>> Email:thomas@openspaceconsulting.com >>> <mailto:thomas@openspaceconsulting.com> >>> Homepage:www.openspaceconsulting.com >>> <http://www.openspaceconsulting.com/>/www.5toFold.com >>> <http://www.5tofold.com/> >>> Profile on >>> LinkedIn:www.linkedin.com/in/thomasherrmannopenspaceconsult >>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thomasherrmannopenspaceconsult> >>> Open Space Consulting frigör livskraft i människor, organisationer >>> och samhälle. >>> /We release lifepower in people, organizations and society./ >>> *Trainings/workshops (Info & registration >>> <https://openspaceconsulting.com/kategori/aktiviteter/kommande-aktiviteter/>)* >>> 9-11 Sept: Working with Open Space Technology, Lunteren, the Netherlands >>> 23-25 Sept: Att arbeta hållbart med Open Space-metoden, Örby, Sverige >>> 8 Okt: Erfa-utbyte om Open Space (gratis, online) >>> 17-19 Okt: Open Space för Demokrati, Gullbrannagården. >>> 6-8 Nov: WorldOpenSpaceOnOpenSpace, Nairobi, Kenya >>> 2026 >>> 20-22 Jan: Whole Person Process Facilitation, Örby Sverige >>> 27-29 Jan: Att arbeta hållbart med Open Space-metoden, Örby, Sverige >>> 11-13 March: Whole Person Process Facilitation, Lunteren, the >>> Netherlands >>> Continous opportunities for*online learning - selfstudy + >>> mentoring*– leadership and facilitation incl Open Space >>> <image001.png> >>> >>> OSList mailing list --everyone@oslist.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email toeveryone-leave@oslist.org >>> See the archives here:https://oslist.org/empathy/list/everyone.oslist.org >> >> OSList mailing list --everyone@oslist.org >> To unsubscribe send an email toeveryone-leave@oslist.org >> See the archives here:https://oslist.org/empathy/list/everyone.oslist.org >> >> OSList mailing list -- everyone@oslist.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to everyone-leave@oslist.org >> See the archives here: >> https://oslist.org/empathy/list/everyone.oslist.org > > OSList mailing list -- everyone@oslist.org > To unsubscribe send an email to everyone-leave@oslist.org > See the archives here: https://oslist.org/empathy/list/everyone.oslist.org > > > OSList mailing list --everyone@oslist.org > To unsubscribe send an email toeveryone-leave@oslist.org > See the archives here:https://oslist.org/empathy/list/everyone.oslist.org Michael M Pannwitz Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin +49 30 7728000mmpannwitz@posteo.de