everyone@oslist.org

World wide Open Space Technology email list

View all threads

Thai version of Principles, Law and Admonition

MM
Michael M Pannwitz
Wed, May 24, 2023 11:03 AM

Dear colleagues and friends,

Below you can see the translation  of the 4 Principles, the One Law and
the Admonition (Be prepared to be surprised) into Thai, contributed by
Jost Wagner in the spirit of sharing what we learn and produce in the
ost realm.

4 Principles of Open Space
1.    คนที่ผ่านเข้ามาล้วนแต่เป็นคนที่เหมาะสมทั้งสิ้น
2.    เหตุการณ์ต่าง ๆ ที่เกิดขึ้นล้วนแต่เป็นสิ่งที่จำเป็นต้องเกิด
3.    เวลาที่เริ่มต้น ถือเป็นเวลาที่เหมาะสมทั้งสิ้น
4.    เมื่อมันสิ้นสุดลง ก็คือมันสิ้นสุดลง

One Law
    กฎแห่งเท้าทั้งสอง หรือ กฏแห่งการเคลื่อนที่

Be prepared to be surprised.
    เปิดใจเตรียมพบกับเรื่องแปลกใหม่

Lets share more of this stuff in our various languages (a while back
there were various attempts to design multiple language  tables, I think
that  Artur da Silva from Portugal and Lisa Heft were two of those
involved).

Just in case any of you need the German version (my version), see here:

4 Tatsachen des Lebens
--- Die da sind, sind genau die Richtigen
--- Was auch immer geschieht: Es ist das Einzige, was geschehen konnte
--- Vorbei ist Vorbei... Nicht Vorbei ist nicht Vorbei
--- Es fängt an. wenn die Zeit reif ist

Das Gesetz der zwei Füße

Ermahnung
--- Augen auf! Mit Überraschungen ist zu rechnen!

Shortly after the Maidan, Harrison Owen and and Claudia Gross (she came
to the European Learning Exchange in Sardinia straight from Egypt in
2011 and HO from Rome) huddled and came up with a Fifth Principle:

--- Whereever it happens - it is the right place

I did not get around creating a German version (stepped back in 2012).
Someone else probably did it, though.

Have a great day wherever you are

ciao
mmp

Michael M Pannwitz
Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany
+49 30 7728000    mmpannwitz@posteo.de

The annual Worldwide Open Space on Open Space
(WOSonOS) will gather in Berlin
from October 18 through 21, 2023.
Check the website
https://www.wosonos2023.berlin/

Dear colleagues and friends, Below you can see the translation  of the 4 Principles, the One Law and the Admonition (Be prepared to be surprised) into Thai, contributed by Jost Wagner in the spirit of sharing what we learn and produce in the ost realm. 4 Principles of Open Space 1.    คนที่ผ่านเข้ามาล้วนแต่เป็นคนที่เหมาะสมทั้งสิ้น 2.    เหตุการณ์ต่าง ๆ ที่เกิดขึ้นล้วนแต่เป็นสิ่งที่จำเป็นต้องเกิด 3.    เวลาที่เริ่มต้น ถือเป็นเวลาที่เหมาะสมทั้งสิ้น 4.    เมื่อมันสิ้นสุดลง ก็คือมันสิ้นสุดลง One Law     กฎแห่งเท้าทั้งสอง หรือ กฏแห่งการเคลื่อนที่ Be prepared to be surprised.     เปิดใจเตรียมพบกับเรื่องแปลกใหม่ Lets share more of this stuff in our various languages (a while back there were various attempts to design multiple language  tables, I think that  Artur da Silva from Portugal and Lisa Heft were two of those involved). Just in case any of you need the German version (my version), see here: 4 Tatsachen des Lebens --- Die da sind, sind genau die Richtigen --- Was auch immer geschieht: Es ist das Einzige, was geschehen konnte --- Vorbei ist Vorbei... Nicht Vorbei ist nicht Vorbei --- Es fängt an. wenn die Zeit reif ist Das Gesetz der zwei Füße Ermahnung --- Augen auf! Mit Überraschungen ist zu rechnen! Shortly after the Maidan, Harrison Owen and and Claudia Gross (she came to the European Learning Exchange in Sardinia straight from Egypt in 2011 and HO from Rome) huddled and came up with a Fifth Principle: --- Whereever it happens - it is the right place I did not get around creating a German version (stepped back in 2012). Someone else probably did it, though. Have a great day wherever you are ciao mmp Michael M Pannwitz Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany +49 30 7728000 mmpannwitz@posteo.de The annual Worldwide Open Space on Open Space (WOSonOS) will gather in Berlin from October 18 through 21, 2023. Check the website https://www.wosonos2023.berlin/
CK
christine koehler
Fri, Jun 23, 2023 4:27 PM

Dear all,

Peggy who gave me a hand on my last OS event suggested I post the story here. Hoping we would share more stories of OS again.;)
Here it is. Hope you enjoy it !

I was contacted by an international organization a few weeks ago, following another OS event someone attended last year and that I facilitated and this someone recommended me when a facilitator was looked for.

Issue was as follows :
Sponsor was the secretariat of a partnership of 3 international organizations, working on an international strategy. This year was mid term of the strategy and there has been an independent evaluation of the strategy. Evaluation has been submitted to leadership and approved. Now the project management team needed to answer concretely to those 8 recommandations and 40 sub-recommandations.
This management team that meet usually by visioconférence agreed that they needed to do that in person.
So they agreed for a  2 days gathering.

When they called, the seminar was planned 4 weeks later.

I said I could help.
Tova pointed out that I was brave and indeed I was. Or foolish more probably. Because the evaluation pointed 40 detailed actions...
I felt I could help only with OST.
They agreed. `

Here is what happened.

Pre work was difficult because
1/ timing was really tight (4 weeks...)
2/ they were over busy.

I insisted to have a planing team with the 3 different partners of strategy. But one of them was still more busy than the others and we could only see us once, one week prior to the event. Of course this lady was very doubtful about OST and we didn’t ’t have time to adresse her concerns fully.
The other person from the 3rd organization was also skeptical but the feeling was different.

This lady raised of course her concern again in the opening circle the morning of the event : we won’t  be able to address all the 40 sub-recommandations !
So we took into account her idea and opened a Parking Lot for topics we could not explore fully as there were a few missing stakeholders, and  a few topics that were to be addressed in future  meetings already  planned in the coming weeks.

It was interesting to see how this lady was torn :
From the very beginning of the prework , when I learned that she would be the only one from the funding agency, and that this was of course the most delicate matter, I suggested they invited more people from her organization. But she didn’t invited them, saying : "there is no agenda, I can’t invite them".
We were in her building, her organisation was the host of the meeting.
As I was explaining how we were going to create the agenda, she suddenly disappeared  and came back 10 mn later with one of her colleague, who finally stayed the whole day and participated in many discussions (on and off ;).
The second day, I saw  that she had invited also another colleague who had a few chats here and there, not really in, but beautifully butterflying.

It went very well of course.

On the second day, we started with a very top-down 15 mn time from one of the partner who needed to give information to all. Then we split into the 2 additional topics that were not held on day 1.

Then I did CHEEKS IN CHAIRS activity that Peggy had told me about : Everyone standing,  I asked : what really stands out for you right now ?
Someone would start. As soon as everything that stand out for someone was said, this person would sit down.
We laughed : After only  3 people, everyone was seated..
So much convergence visible.

Then we worked on the action plans. I had asked for giant printed templates, and more breakout rooms.

There were more butterflies during the action planning… argh, this lady dealing with money was upset again.

At the end of day 2, one very important action plan was missing : the host completely had disappeared for a few hours.
...
But 4 days later, the action plan appeared in my mail box;)

The closing was all about being so happy to have met everyone and connected.

Here is what they told me when I debriefed with the sponsor :

They particularly appreciated the calm and sense of intimacy the breakout sessions created.
Although they all left absolutely drained. So much work done..

They felt it enabled everyone, including the new people, those who are coming into the strategy and still need to learn so much, to get comfortable to participate from the very beginning , each one as equal . This is not common in this kind of organizations , there are people who are held much more above others…Usually they are the ones who talk.

They had very good feedback from participants and  are already spreading the word of OST .

And what they were most happy about what that everyone made the subjects their own, which they are sure will facilitate the strategy in the coming years, as each of them needs to take decision according to what is happening in its own area or field.. self-organizing I would say.

Beautiful isn’t it ?
;)

Have a great week end
Christine

Dear all, Peggy who gave me a hand on my last OS event suggested I post the story here. Hoping we would share more stories of OS again.;) Here it is. Hope you enjoy it ! I was contacted by an international organization a few weeks ago, following another OS event someone attended last year and that I facilitated and this someone recommended me when a facilitator was looked for. Issue was as follows : Sponsor was the secretariat of a partnership of 3 international organizations, working on an international strategy. This year was mid term of the strategy and there has been an independent evaluation of the strategy. Evaluation has been submitted to leadership and approved. Now the project management team needed to answer concretely to those 8 recommandations and 40 sub-recommandations. This management team that meet usually by visioconférence agreed that they needed to do that in person. So they agreed for a 2 days gathering. When they called, the seminar was planned 4 weeks later. I said I could help. Tova pointed out that I was brave and indeed I was. Or foolish more probably. Because the evaluation pointed 40 detailed actions... I felt I could help only with OST. They agreed. ` Here is what happened. Pre work was difficult because 1/ timing was really tight (4 weeks...) 2/ they were over busy. I insisted to have a planing team with the 3 different partners of strategy. But one of them was still more busy than the others and we could only see us once, one week prior to the event. Of course this lady was very doubtful about OST and we didn’t ’t have time to adresse her concerns fully. The other person from the 3rd organization was also skeptical but the feeling was different. This lady raised of course her concern again in the opening circle the morning of the event : we won’t be able to address all the 40 sub-recommandations ! So we took into account her idea and opened a Parking Lot for topics we could not explore fully as there were a few missing stakeholders, and a few topics that were to be addressed in future meetings already planned in the coming weeks. It was interesting to see how this lady was torn : From the very beginning of the prework , when I learned that she would be the only one from the funding agency, and that this was of course the most delicate matter, I suggested they invited more people from her organization. But she didn’t invited them, saying : "there is no agenda, I can’t invite them". We were in her building, her organisation was the host of the meeting. As I was explaining how we were going to create the agenda, she suddenly disappeared and came back 10 mn later with one of her colleague, who finally stayed the whole day and participated in many discussions (on and off ;). The second day, I saw that she had invited also another colleague who had a few chats here and there, not really in, but beautifully butterflying. It went very well of course. On the second day, we started with a very top-down 15 mn time from one of the partner who needed to give information to all. Then we split into the 2 additional topics that were not held on day 1. Then I did CHEEKS IN CHAIRS activity that Peggy had told me about : Everyone standing, I asked : what really stands out for you right now ? Someone would start. As soon as everything that stand out for someone was said, this person would sit down. We laughed : After only 3 people, everyone was seated.. So much convergence visible. Then we worked on the action plans. I had asked for giant printed templates, and more breakout rooms. There were more butterflies during the action planning… argh, this lady dealing with money was upset again. At the end of day 2, one very important action plan was missing : the host completely had disappeared for a few hours. ... But 4 days later, the action plan appeared in my mail box;) The closing was all about being so happy to have met everyone and connected. Here is what they told me when I debriefed with the sponsor : They particularly appreciated the calm and sense of intimacy the breakout sessions created. Although they all left absolutely drained. So much work done.. They felt it enabled everyone, including the new people, those who are coming into the strategy and still need to learn so much, to get comfortable to participate from the very beginning , each one as equal . This is not common in this kind of organizations , there are people who are held much more above others…Usually they are the ones who talk. They had very good feedback from participants and are already spreading the word of OST . And what they were most happy about what that everyone made the subjects their own, which they are sure will facilitate the strategy in the coming years, as each of them needs to take decision according to what is happening in its own area or field.. self-organizing I would say. Beautiful isn’t it ? ;) Have a great week end Christine
MM
Michael M Pannwitz
Fri, Jun 23, 2023 4:36 PM

Yes, Christine, it is beautiful.
Thanks for the story.
I bet it will come up at the WOSonOS2023!

tickle selforganisation whenever you can
cheers
mmp

Am 23.06.2023 um 18:27 schrieb christine koehler via OSList:

Dear all,

Peggy who gave me a hand on my last OS event suggested I post the
story here. Hoping we would share more stories of OS again.;)

Here it is. Hope you enjoy it !

I was contacted by an international organization a few weeks ago,
following another OS event someone attended last year and that I
facilitated and this someone recommended me when a facilitator was
looked for.

Issue was as follows :

Sponsor was the secretariat of a partnership of 3 international
organizations, working on an international strategy. This year was mid
term of the strategy and there has been an independent evaluation of
the strategy. Evaluation has been submitted to leadership and
approved. Now the project management team needed to answer concretely
to those 8 recommandations and 40 sub-recommandations.

This management team that meet usually by visioconférence agreed that
they needed to do that in person.

So they agreed for a  2 days gathering.

When they called, the seminar was planned 4 weeks later.

I said I could help.

Tova pointed out that I was brave and indeed I was. Or foolish more
probably. Because the evaluation pointed 40 detailed actions...

I felt I could help only with OST.

They agreed. `

Here is what happened.

Pre work was difficult because

1/ timing was really tight (4 weeks...)

2/ they were over busy.

I insisted to have a planing team with the 3 different partners of
strategy. But one of them was still more busy than the others and we
could only see us once, one week prior to the event. Of course this
lady was very doubtful about OST and we didn’t ’t have time to adresse
her concerns fully.

The other person from the 3rd organization was also skeptical but the
feeling was different.

This lady raised of course her concern again in the opening circle the
morning of the event : we won’t  be able to address all the 40
sub-recommandations !

So we took into account her idea and opened a Parking Lot for topics
we could not explore fully as there were a few missing stakeholders,
and  a few topics that were to be addressed in future  meetings
already  planned in the coming weeks.

It was interesting to see how this lady was torn :

From the very beginning of the prework , when I learned that she would
be the only one from the funding agency, and that this was of course
the most delicate matter, I suggested they invited more people from
her organization. But she didn’t invited them, saying : "there is no
agenda, I can’t invite them".

We were in her building, her organisation was the host of the meeting.

As I was explaining how we were going to create the agenda, she
suddenly disappeared  and came back 10 mn later with one of her
colleague, who finally stayed the whole day and participated in many
discussions (on and off ;).

The second day, I saw  that she had invited also another colleague who
had a few chats here and there, not really in, but beautifully
butterflying.

It went very well of course.

On the second day, we started with a very top-down 15 mn time from one
of the partner who needed to give information to all. Then we split
into the 2 additional topics that were not held on day 1.

Then I did CHEEKS IN CHAIRS activity that Peggy had told me about :
Everyone standing,  I asked : what really stands out for you right now ?

Someone would start. As soon as everything that stand out for someone
was said, this person would sit down.

We laughed : After only  3 people, everyone was seated..

So much convergence visible.

Then we worked on the action plans. I had asked for giant printed
templates, and more breakout rooms.

There were more butterflies during the action planning… argh, this
lady dealing with money was upset again.

At the end of day 2, one very important action plan was missing : the
host completely had disappeared for a few hours.

...

But 4 days later, the action plan appeared in my mail box;)

The closing was all about being so happy to have met everyone and
connected.

Here is what they told me when I debriefed with the sponsor :

They particularly appreciated the calm and sense of intimacy the
breakout sessions created.

 Although they all left absolutely drained. So much work done..

They felt it enabled everyone, including the new people, those who are
coming into the strategy and still need to learn so much, to get
comfortable to participate from the very beginning , each one as equal
. This is not common in this kind of organizations , there are people
who are held much more above others…Usually they are the ones who talk.

They had very good feedback from participants and  are already
spreading the word of OST .

And what they were most happy about what that everyone made the
subjects their own, which they are sure will facilitate the strategy
in the coming years, as each of them needs to take decision according
to what is happening in its own area or field.. self-organizing I
would say.

Beautiful isn’t it ?

;)

Have a great week end

Christine

OSList mailing list --everyone@oslist.org
To unsubscribe send an email toeveryone-leave@oslist.org
See the archives here:https://oslist.org/empathy/list/everyone.oslist.org

Michael M Pannwitz
Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany
+49 30 7728000mmpannwitz@posteo.de

The annual Worldwide Open Space on Open Space
(WOSonOS) will gather in Berlin
from October 18 through 21, 2023.
Check the website
https://www.wosonos2023.berlin/

Yes, Christine, it is beautiful. Thanks for the story. I bet it will come up at the WOSonOS2023! tickle selforganisation whenever you can cheers mmp Am 23.06.2023 um 18:27 schrieb christine koehler via OSList: > > Dear all, > > > Peggy who gave me a hand on my last OS event suggested I post the > story here. Hoping we would share more stories of OS again.;) > > Here it is. Hope you enjoy it ! > > > I was contacted by an international organization a few weeks ago, > following another OS event someone attended last year and that I > facilitated and this someone recommended me when a facilitator was > looked for. > > > Issue was as follows : > > Sponsor was the secretariat of a partnership of 3 international > organizations, working on an international strategy. This year was mid > term of the strategy and there has been an independent evaluation of > the strategy. Evaluation has been submitted to leadership and > approved. Now the project management team needed to answer concretely > to those 8 recommandations and 40 sub-recommandations. > > This management team that meet usually by visioconférence agreed that > they needed to do that in person. > > So they agreed for a  2 days gathering. > > > When they called, the seminar was planned 4 weeks later. > > > I said I could help. > > Tova pointed out that I was brave and indeed I was. Or foolish more > probably. Because the evaluation pointed 40 detailed actions... > > I felt I could help only with OST. > > They agreed. ` > > > Here is what happened. > > > Pre work was difficult because > > 1/ timing was really tight (4 weeks...) > > 2/ they were over busy. > > > I insisted to have a planing team with the 3 different partners of > strategy. But one of them was still more busy than the others and we > could only see us once, one week prior to the event. Of course this > lady was very doubtful about OST and we didn’t ’t have time to adresse > her concerns fully. > > The other person from the 3rd organization was also skeptical but the > feeling was different. > > > This lady raised of course her concern again in the opening circle the > morning of the event : we won’t  be able to address all the 40 > sub-recommandations ! > > So we took into account her idea and opened a Parking Lot for topics > we could not explore fully as there were a few missing stakeholders, > and  a few topics that were to be addressed in future  meetings > already  planned in the coming weeks. > > > It was interesting to see how this lady was torn : > > From the very beginning of the prework , when I learned that she would > be the only one from the funding agency, and that this was of course > the most delicate matter, I suggested they invited more people from > her organization. But she didn’t invited them, saying : "there is no > agenda, I can’t invite them". > > We were in her building, her organisation was the host of the meeting. > > As I was explaining how we were going to create the agenda, she > suddenly disappeared  and came back 10 mn later with one of her > colleague, who finally stayed the whole day and participated in many > discussions (on and off ;). > > The second day, I saw  that she had invited also another colleague who > had a few chats here and there, not really in, but beautifully > butterflying. > > > It went very well of course. > > > On the second day, we started with a very top-down 15 mn time from one > of the partner who needed to give information to all. Then we split > into the 2 additional topics that were not held on day 1. > > > Then I did CHEEKS IN CHAIRS activity that Peggy had told me about : > Everyone standing,  I asked : what really stands out for you right now ? > > Someone would start. As soon as everything that stand out for someone > was said, this person would sit down. > > We laughed : After only  3 people, everyone was seated.. > > So much convergence visible. > > > Then we worked on the action plans. I had asked for giant printed > templates, and more breakout rooms. > > > There were more butterflies during the action planning… argh, this > lady dealing with money was upset again. > > > At the end of day 2, one very important action plan was missing : the > host completely had disappeared for a few hours. > > ... > > But 4 days later, the action plan appeared in my mail box;) > > > The closing was all about being so happy to have met everyone and > connected. > > > Here is what they told me when I debriefed with the sponsor : > > > They particularly appreciated the calm and sense of intimacy the > breakout sessions created. > >  Although they all left absolutely drained. So much work done.. > > > They felt it enabled everyone, including the new people, those who are > coming into the strategy and still need to learn so much, to get > comfortable to participate from the very beginning , each one as equal > . This is not common in this kind of organizations , there are people > who are held much more above others…Usually they are the ones who talk. > > > They had very good feedback from participants and  are already > spreading the word of OST . > > > And what they were most happy about what that everyone made the > subjects their own, which they are sure will facilitate the strategy > in the coming years, as each of them needs to take decision according > to what is happening in its own area or field.. self-organizing I > would say. > > > Beautiful isn’t it ? > > ;) > > > Have a great week end > > Christine > > > OSList mailing list --everyone@oslist.org > To unsubscribe send an email toeveryone-leave@oslist.org > See the archives here:https://oslist.org/empathy/list/everyone.oslist.org Michael M Pannwitz Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany +49 30 7728000mmpannwitz@posteo.de The annual Worldwide Open Space on Open Space (WOSonOS) will gather in Berlin from October 18 through 21, 2023. Check the website https://www.wosonos2023.berlin/
CC
Chris Corrigan
Fri, Jun 23, 2023 4:41 PM

Beautiful!

And yes to more stories, I'll get a recent one together because I'm finding
that after the pandemic especially, people just want to focus on what's
important, and everyone treats well-thought-out plans with a certain amount
of humour and cynicism!  I've been doing more Open Space meetings in the
last 18 months than ever before, to the relief of all.

Chris

On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 9:37 AM Michael M Pannwitz via OSList <
everyone@oslist.org> wrote:

Yes, Christine, it is beautiful.
Thanks for the story.
I bet it will come up at the WOSonOS2023!

tickle selforganisation whenever you can
cheers
mmp

Am 23.06.2023 um 18:27 schrieb christine koehler via OSList:

Dear all,

Peggy who gave me a hand on my last OS event suggested I post the story
here. Hoping we would share more stories of OS again.;)

Here it is. Hope you enjoy it !

I was contacted by an international organization a few weeks ago,
following another OS event someone attended last year and that I
facilitated and this someone recommended me when a facilitator was looked
for.

Issue was as follows :

Sponsor was the secretariat of a partnership of 3 international
organizations, working on an international strategy. This year was mid term
of the strategy and there has been an independent evaluation of the
strategy. Evaluation has been submitted to leadership and approved. Now the
project management team needed to answer concretely to those 8
recommandations and 40 sub-recommandations.

This management team that meet usually by visioconférence agreed that they
needed to do that in person.

So they agreed for a  2 days gathering.

When they called, the seminar was planned 4 weeks later.

I said I could help.

Tova pointed out that I was brave and indeed I was. Or foolish more
probably. Because the evaluation pointed 40 detailed actions...

I felt I could help only with OST.

They agreed. `

Here is what happened.

Pre work was difficult because

1/ timing was really tight (4 weeks...)

2/ they were over busy.

I insisted to have a planing team with the 3 different partners of
strategy. But one of them was still more busy than the others and we could
only see us once, one week prior to the event. Of course this lady was very
doubtful about OST and we didn’t ’t have time to adresse her concerns fully.

The other person from the 3rd organization was also skeptical but the
feeling was different.

This lady raised of course her concern again in the opening circle the
morning of the event : we won’t  be able to address all the 40
sub-recommandations !

So we took into account her idea and opened a Parking Lot for topics we
could not explore fully as there were a few missing stakeholders, and  a
few topics that were to be addressed in future  meetings already  planned
in the coming weeks.

It was interesting to see how this lady was torn :

From the very beginning of the prework , when I learned that she would be
the only one from the funding agency, and that this was of course the most
delicate matter, I suggested they invited more people from her
organization. But she didn’t invited them, saying : "there is no agenda, I
can’t invite them".

We were in her building, her organisation was the host of the meeting.

As I was explaining how we were going to create the agenda, she suddenly
disappeared  and came back 10 mn later with one of her colleague, who
finally stayed the whole day and participated in many discussions (on and
off ;).

The second day, I saw  that she had invited also another colleague who had
a few chats here and there, not really in, but beautifully butterflying.

It went very well of course.

On the second day, we started with a very top-down 15 mn time from one of
the partner who needed to give information to all. Then we split into the 2
additional topics that were not held on day 1.

Then I did CHEEKS IN CHAIRS activity that Peggy had told me about :
Everyone standing,  I asked : what really stands out for you right now ?

Someone would start. As soon as everything that stand out for someone was
said, this person would sit down.

We laughed : After only  3 people, everyone was seated..

So much convergence visible.

Then we worked on the action plans. I had asked for giant printed
templates, and more breakout rooms.

There were more butterflies during the action planning… argh, this lady
dealing with money was upset again.

At the end of day 2, one very important action plan was missing : the host
completely had disappeared for a few hours.

...

But 4 days later, the action plan appeared in my mail box;)

The closing was all about being so happy to have met everyone and
connected.

Here is what they told me when I debriefed with the sponsor :

They particularly appreciated the calm and sense of intimacy the breakout
sessions created.

Although they all left absolutely drained. So much work done..

They felt it enabled everyone, including the new people, those who are
coming into the strategy and still need to learn so much, to get
comfortable to participate from the very beginning , each one as equal .
This is not common in this kind of organizations , there are people who are
held much more above others…Usually they are the ones who talk.

They had very good feedback from participants and  are already spreading
the word of OST .

And what they were most happy about what that everyone made the subjects
their own, which they are sure will facilitate the strategy in the coming
years, as each of them needs to take decision according to what is
happening in its own area or field.. self-organizing I would say.

Beautiful isn’t it ?

;)

Have a great week end

Christine

OSList mailing list -- everyone@oslist.org
To unsubscribe send an email to everyone-leave@oslist.org
See the archives here: https://oslist.org/empathy/list/everyone.oslist.org

Michael M Pannwitz
Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany
+49 30 7728000    mmpannwitz@posteo.de

The annual Worldwide Open Space on Open Space
(WOSonOS) will gather in Berlin
from October 18 through 21, 2023.
Check the websitehttps://www.wosonos2023.berlin/

OSList mailing list -- everyone@oslist.org
To unsubscribe send an email to everyone-leave@oslist.org
See the archives here: https://oslist.org/empathy/list/everyone.oslist.org

--


CHRIS CORRIGAN
Blog and resources: http://www.chriscorrigan.com
Harvest Moon Consultants: https://www.harvestmoonconsultants.com

Upcoming events and workshops and online courses:
https://www.chriscorrigan.com/parkinglot/events/

Located on Nex̱wlélex̱wm (Bowen Island), Sḵwx̱wú7mesh-ulh territory,

Beautiful! And yes to more stories, I'll get a recent one together because I'm finding that after the pandemic especially, people just want to focus on what's important, and everyone treats well-thought-out plans with a certain amount of humour and cynicism! I've been doing more Open Space meetings in the last 18 months than ever before, to the relief of all. Chris On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 9:37 AM Michael M Pannwitz via OSList < everyone@oslist.org> wrote: > Yes, Christine, it is beautiful. > Thanks for the story. > I bet it will come up at the WOSonOS2023! > > tickle selforganisation whenever you can > cheers > mmp > > Am 23.06.2023 um 18:27 schrieb christine koehler via OSList: > > Dear all, > > > Peggy who gave me a hand on my last OS event suggested I post the story > here. Hoping we would share more stories of OS again.;) > > Here it is. Hope you enjoy it ! > > > I was contacted by an international organization a few weeks ago, > following another OS event someone attended last year and that I > facilitated and this someone recommended me when a facilitator was looked > for. > > > Issue was as follows : > > Sponsor was the secretariat of a partnership of 3 international > organizations, working on an international strategy. This year was mid term > of the strategy and there has been an independent evaluation of the > strategy. Evaluation has been submitted to leadership and approved. Now the > project management team needed to answer concretely to those 8 > recommandations and 40 sub-recommandations. > > This management team that meet usually by visioconférence agreed that they > needed to do that in person. > > So they agreed for a 2 days gathering. > > > When they called, the seminar was planned 4 weeks later. > > > I said I could help. > > Tova pointed out that I was brave and indeed I was. Or foolish more > probably. Because the evaluation pointed 40 detailed actions... > > I felt I could help only with OST. > > They agreed. ` > > > Here is what happened. > > > Pre work was difficult because > > 1/ timing was really tight (4 weeks...) > > 2/ they were over busy. > > > I insisted to have a planing team with the 3 different partners of > strategy. But one of them was still more busy than the others and we could > only see us once, one week prior to the event. Of course this lady was very > doubtful about OST and we didn’t ’t have time to adresse her concerns fully. > > The other person from the 3rd organization was also skeptical but the > feeling was different. > > > This lady raised of course her concern again in the opening circle the > morning of the event : we won’t be able to address all the 40 > sub-recommandations ! > > So we took into account her idea and opened a Parking Lot for topics we > could not explore fully as there were a few missing stakeholders, and a > few topics that were to be addressed in future meetings already planned > in the coming weeks. > > > It was interesting to see how this lady was torn : > > From the very beginning of the prework , when I learned that she would be > the only one from the funding agency, and that this was of course the most > delicate matter, I suggested they invited more people from her > organization. But she didn’t invited them, saying : "there is no agenda, I > can’t invite them". > > We were in her building, her organisation was the host of the meeting. > > As I was explaining how we were going to create the agenda, she suddenly > disappeared and came back 10 mn later with one of her colleague, who > finally stayed the whole day and participated in many discussions (on and > off ;). > > The second day, I saw that she had invited also another colleague who had > a few chats here and there, not really in, but beautifully butterflying. > > > It went very well of course. > > > On the second day, we started with a very top-down 15 mn time from one of > the partner who needed to give information to all. Then we split into the 2 > additional topics that were not held on day 1. > > > Then I did CHEEKS IN CHAIRS activity that Peggy had told me about : > Everyone standing, I asked : what really stands out for you right now ? > > Someone would start. As soon as everything that stand out for someone was > said, this person would sit down. > > We laughed : After only 3 people, everyone was seated.. > > So much convergence visible. > > > Then we worked on the action plans. I had asked for giant printed > templates, and more breakout rooms. > > > There were more butterflies during the action planning… argh, this lady > dealing with money was upset again. > > > At the end of day 2, one very important action plan was missing : the host > completely had disappeared for a few hours. > > ... > > But 4 days later, the action plan appeared in my mail box;) > > > The closing was all about being so happy to have met everyone and > connected. > > > Here is what they told me when I debriefed with the sponsor : > > > They particularly appreciated the calm and sense of intimacy the breakout > sessions created. > > Although they all left absolutely drained. So much work done.. > > > They felt it enabled everyone, including the new people, those who are > coming into the strategy and still need to learn so much, to get > comfortable to participate from the very beginning , each one as equal . > This is not common in this kind of organizations , there are people who are > held much more above others…Usually they are the ones who talk. > > > They had very good feedback from participants and are already spreading > the word of OST . > > > And what they were most happy about what that everyone made the subjects > their own, which they are sure will facilitate the strategy in the coming > years, as each of them needs to take decision according to what is > happening in its own area or field.. self-organizing I would say. > > > Beautiful isn’t it ? > > ;) > > > Have a great week end > > Christine > > OSList mailing list -- everyone@oslist.org > To unsubscribe send an email to everyone-leave@oslist.org > See the archives here: https://oslist.org/empathy/list/everyone.oslist.org > > > Michael M Pannwitz > Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany > +49 30 7728000 mmpannwitz@posteo.de > > The annual Worldwide Open Space on Open Space > (WOSonOS) will gather in Berlin > from October 18 through 21, 2023. > Check the websitehttps://www.wosonos2023.berlin/ > > OSList mailing list -- everyone@oslist.org > To unsubscribe send an email to everyone-leave@oslist.org > See the archives here: https://oslist.org/empathy/list/everyone.oslist.org -- ____ CHRIS CORRIGAN Blog and resources: http://www.chriscorrigan.com Harvest Moon Consultants: https://www.harvestmoonconsultants.com Upcoming events and workshops and online courses: https://www.chriscorrigan.com/parkinglot/events/ Located on Nex̱wlélex̱wm (Bowen Island), Sḵwx̱wú7mesh-ulh territory,
TV
Tonnie van der Zouwen
Tue, Jun 27, 2023 8:12 AM

Thanks Christine, what a beautiful and honest story. Thanks Peggy for the Cheeks in chairs method, very helpful.

Love,

Tonnie

Van: Michael M Pannwitz via OSList everyone@oslist.org
Verzonden: vrijdag 23 juni 2023 18:37
Aan: everyone@oslist.org
Onderwerp: [OSList] Re: OST and international strategy.

Yes, Christine, it is beautiful.
Thanks for the story.
I bet it will come up at the WOSonOS2023!

tickle selforganisation whenever you can
cheers
mmp

Am 23.06.2023 um 18:27 schrieb christine koehler via OSList:

Dear all,

Peggy who gave me a hand on my last OS event suggested I post the story here. Hoping we would share more stories of OS again.;)

Here it is. Hope you enjoy it !

I was contacted by an international organization a few weeks ago, following another OS event someone attended last year and that I facilitated and this someone recommended me when a facilitator was looked for.

Issue was as follows :

Sponsor was the secretariat of a partnership of 3 international organizations, working on an international strategy. This year was mid term of the strategy and there has been an independent evaluation of the strategy. Evaluation has been submitted to leadership and approved. Now the project management team needed to answer concretely to those 8 recommandations and 40 sub-recommandations.

This management team that meet usually by visioconférence agreed that they needed to do that in person.

So they agreed for a  2 days gathering.

When they called, the seminar was planned 4 weeks later.

I said I could help.

Tova pointed out that I was brave and indeed I was. Or foolish more probably. Because the evaluation pointed 40 detailed actions...

I felt I could help only with OST.

They agreed. `

Here is what happened.

Pre work was difficult because

1/ timing was really tight (4 weeks...)

2/ they were over busy.

I insisted to have a planing team with the 3 different partners of strategy. But one of them was still more busy than the others and we could only see us once, one week prior to the event. Of course this lady was very doubtful about OST and we didn’t ’t have time to adresse her concerns fully.

The other person from the 3rd organization was also skeptical but the feeling was different.

This lady raised of course her concern again in the opening circle the morning of the event : we won’t  be able to address all the 40 sub-recommandations !

So we took into account her idea and opened a Parking Lot for topics we could not explore fully as there were a few missing stakeholders, and  a few topics that were to be addressed in future  meetings already  planned in the coming weeks.

It was interesting to see how this lady was torn :

From the very beginning of the prework , when I learned that she would be the only one from the funding agency, and that this was of course the most delicate matter, I suggested they invited more people from her organization. But she didn’t invited them, saying : "there is no agenda, I can’t invite them".

We were in her building, her organisation was the host of the meeting.

As I was explaining how we were going to create the agenda, she suddenly disappeared  and came back 10 mn later with one of her colleague, who finally stayed the whole day and participated in many discussions (on and off ;).

The second day, I saw  that she had invited also another colleague who had a few chats here and there, not really in, but beautifully butterflying.

It went very well of course.

On the second day, we started with a very top-down 15 mn time from one of the partner who needed to give information to all. Then we split into the 2 additional topics that were not held on day 1.

Then I did CHEEKS IN CHAIRS activity that Peggy had told me about : Everyone standing,  I asked : what really stands out for you right now ?

Someone would start. As soon as everything that stand out for someone was said, this person would sit down.

We laughed : After only  3 people, everyone was seated..

So much convergence visible.

Then we worked on the action plans. I had asked for giant printed templates, and more breakout rooms.

There were more butterflies during the action planning… argh, this lady dealing with money was upset again.

At the end of day 2, one very important action plan was missing : the host completely had disappeared for a few hours.

...

But 4 days later, the action plan appeared in my mail box;)

The closing was all about being so happy to have met everyone and connected.

Here is what they told me when I debriefed with the sponsor :

They particularly appreciated the calm and sense of intimacy the breakout sessions created.

Although they all left absolutely drained. So much work done..

They felt it enabled everyone, including the new people, those who are coming into the strategy and still need to learn so much, to get comfortable to participate from the very beginning , each one as equal . This is not common in this kind of organizations , there are people who are held much more above others…Usually they are the ones who talk.

They had very good feedback from participants and  are already spreading the word of OST .

And what they were most happy about what that everyone made the subjects their own, which they are sure will facilitate the strategy in the coming years, as each of them needs to take decision according to what is happening in its own area or field.. self-organizing I would say.

Beautiful isn’t it ?

;)

Have a great week end

Christine

OSList mailing list -- everyone@oslist.org mailto:everyone@oslist.org
To unsubscribe send an email to everyone-leave@oslist.org mailto:everyone-leave@oslist.org
See the archives here: https://oslist.org/empathy/list/everyone.oslist.org

Michael M Pannwitz
Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany
+49 30 7728000    mmpannwitz@posteo.de mailto:mmpannwitz@posteo.de

The annual Worldwide Open Space on Open Space
(WOSonOS) will gather in Berlin
from October 18 through 21, 2023.
Check the website
https://www.wosonos2023.berlin/

Thanks Christine, what a beautiful and honest story. Thanks Peggy for the Cheeks in chairs method, very helpful. Love, Tonnie Van: Michael M Pannwitz via OSList <everyone@oslist.org> Verzonden: vrijdag 23 juni 2023 18:37 Aan: everyone@oslist.org Onderwerp: [OSList] Re: OST and international strategy. Yes, Christine, it is beautiful. Thanks for the story. I bet it will come up at the WOSonOS2023! tickle selforganisation whenever you can cheers mmp Am 23.06.2023 um 18:27 schrieb christine koehler via OSList: Dear all, Peggy who gave me a hand on my last OS event suggested I post the story here. Hoping we would share more stories of OS again.;) Here it is. Hope you enjoy it ! I was contacted by an international organization a few weeks ago, following another OS event someone attended last year and that I facilitated and this someone recommended me when a facilitator was looked for. Issue was as follows : Sponsor was the secretariat of a partnership of 3 international organizations, working on an international strategy. This year was mid term of the strategy and there has been an independent evaluation of the strategy. Evaluation has been submitted to leadership and approved. Now the project management team needed to answer concretely to those 8 recommandations and 40 sub-recommandations. This management team that meet usually by visioconférence agreed that they needed to do that in person. So they agreed for a 2 days gathering. When they called, the seminar was planned 4 weeks later. I said I could help. Tova pointed out that I was brave and indeed I was. Or foolish more probably. Because the evaluation pointed 40 detailed actions... I felt I could help only with OST. They agreed. ` Here is what happened. Pre work was difficult because 1/ timing was really tight (4 weeks...) 2/ they were over busy. I insisted to have a planing team with the 3 different partners of strategy. But one of them was still more busy than the others and we could only see us once, one week prior to the event. Of course this lady was very doubtful about OST and we didn’t ’t have time to adresse her concerns fully. The other person from the 3rd organization was also skeptical but the feeling was different. This lady raised of course her concern again in the opening circle the morning of the event : we won’t be able to address all the 40 sub-recommandations ! So we took into account her idea and opened a Parking Lot for topics we could not explore fully as there were a few missing stakeholders, and a few topics that were to be addressed in future meetings already planned in the coming weeks. It was interesting to see how this lady was torn : From the very beginning of the prework , when I learned that she would be the only one from the funding agency, and that this was of course the most delicate matter, I suggested they invited more people from her organization. But she didn’t invited them, saying : "there is no agenda, I can’t invite them". We were in her building, her organisation was the host of the meeting. As I was explaining how we were going to create the agenda, she suddenly disappeared and came back 10 mn later with one of her colleague, who finally stayed the whole day and participated in many discussions (on and off ;). The second day, I saw that she had invited also another colleague who had a few chats here and there, not really in, but beautifully butterflying. It went very well of course. On the second day, we started with a very top-down 15 mn time from one of the partner who needed to give information to all. Then we split into the 2 additional topics that were not held on day 1. Then I did CHEEKS IN CHAIRS activity that Peggy had told me about : Everyone standing, I asked : what really stands out for you right now ? Someone would start. As soon as everything that stand out for someone was said, this person would sit down. We laughed : After only 3 people, everyone was seated.. So much convergence visible. Then we worked on the action plans. I had asked for giant printed templates, and more breakout rooms. There were more butterflies during the action planning… argh, this lady dealing with money was upset again. At the end of day 2, one very important action plan was missing : the host completely had disappeared for a few hours. ... But 4 days later, the action plan appeared in my mail box;) The closing was all about being so happy to have met everyone and connected. Here is what they told me when I debriefed with the sponsor : They particularly appreciated the calm and sense of intimacy the breakout sessions created. Although they all left absolutely drained. So much work done.. They felt it enabled everyone, including the new people, those who are coming into the strategy and still need to learn so much, to get comfortable to participate from the very beginning , each one as equal . This is not common in this kind of organizations , there are people who are held much more above others…Usually they are the ones who talk. They had very good feedback from participants and are already spreading the word of OST . And what they were most happy about what that everyone made the subjects their own, which they are sure will facilitate the strategy in the coming years, as each of them needs to take decision according to what is happening in its own area or field.. self-organizing I would say. Beautiful isn’t it ? ;) Have a great week end Christine OSList mailing list -- everyone@oslist.org <mailto:everyone@oslist.org> To unsubscribe send an email to everyone-leave@oslist.org <mailto:everyone-leave@oslist.org> See the archives here: https://oslist.org/empathy/list/everyone.oslist.org Michael M Pannwitz Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany +49 30 7728000 mmpannwitz@posteo.de <mailto:mmpannwitz@posteo.de> The annual Worldwide Open Space on Open Space (WOSonOS) will gather in Berlin from October 18 through 21, 2023. Check the website https://www.wosonos2023.berlin/